1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 214 Cal.App.3d
  5. 214 Cal.App.3d 1510 (1989)
 

AUCHMOODY v. 911 EMERGENCY SERVICES

Docket No. B038563.

214 Cal.App.3d 1510 (1989)

263 Cal. Rptr. 278

CHERYL AUCHMOODY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. 911 EMERGENCY SERVICES, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

October 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hatch & Parent and Thomas D. Wise for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Cappadona & Oldman, L.A. Cappadona, Jeanne A. Taylor, Schramm & Raddue and Kurt H. Pyle for Defendant and Respondent.

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Robert W. Tollen as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

STONE (S.J.), P.J.

Here we are asked to decide whether the trial court erred when it ruled the "24-hour agreements" signed by employees conformed to Wage Order 9-80, subsection 3(G) and were not waiver agreements. We find it did not and affirm judgments entered in favor of respondent.

FACTS

Respondent, 911 Emergency Services, provides ambulance and paramedic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases