1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 718 F.Supp.
  5. 718 F.Supp. 994 (1989)
 

U.S. v. EDMOND

Crim. No. 89-0162.

718 F.Supp. 994 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America v. Rayful EDMOND, III, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

September 5, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., Betty Ann Soiefer, Robert Andary and Barry Tapp, Assistant U.S. Attys., for U.S.

Cynthia W. Lobo, Washington, D.C., for defendant Melvin Butler.

Ernest W. McIntosh, Washington, D.C., for defendant Willie Childress.

Catherine Brown, Washington, D.C., for defendant Keith Cooper.

Arthur M. Levin, Washington, D.C., for defendant Columbus Daniels.

William Garber, Washington, D.C., for defendant Rachelle Edmond.

Vincent Bowers, Washington, D.C., for defendant Ronald Green.

Joseph Virgilio, Washington, D.C., for defendant Robert Hardy.

Elise Haldane, Washington, D.C., for defendant James Antonio Jones.

Leroy Nesbitt, Washington, D.C., for defendant Tony Lewis.

John Drury, Drury and Brennan, Washington, D.C., for defendant Deatria Lindsay.

Michelle A. Roberts, Washington, D.C., for defendant Patrick McDonald.

Thomas Slawson, Washington, D.C., for defendant Bernice Hillman-McGraw.

Robert Werdig, Washington, D.C., for defendant David McGraw.

Joseph Conte, Washington, D.C., for defendant Jerry Millington.

Leonard Long, Washington, D.C., for defendant John Monford.

Robert Sanders, Washington, D.C., for defendant Armaretta Perry.

W. Gary Kohlman, Washington, D.C., for defendant Constance Perry.

Sol Rosen, Washington, D.C., for defendant Melvin Stewart.

Diane Lepley, Washington, D.C., for defendant Emanuel Sutton.

Retna Pullings, Washington, D.C., for defendant Jeffrey Thompson.

Nina Kraut, Washington, D.C., for defendant Rayniece Edmond Thompson.

Idus Daniel, Washington, D.C., for defendant Katrina Wade.

William H. Murphy, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for defendant Rayful Edmond III.

OPINION AND ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Those defendants with standing to do so have moved to suppress the fruits of three searches: (1) an April 16, 1989, search of a house located at 407 M Street, N.E.; (2) a February 5, 1988, search of the same house; and (3) a December 24, 1987, search of an apartment occupied by the defendant Edmond. The Court will address the searches in turn.

1. 407 M Street — April 16, 1989

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases