COHEN v. LORD, DAY & LORD


75 N.Y.2d 95 (1989)

Richard G. Cohen, Appellant, v. Lord, Day & Lord, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 19, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., of the Connecticut Bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Barry H. Singer for appellant.

Robert G. Morvillo, Stephen Gillers and Frederick N. Saal for respondent.

Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur with Judge BELLACOSA; Judge HANCOCK, JR., dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion in which Chief Judge WACHTLER concurs in another separate dissenting opinion.


BELLACOSA, J.

A law firm partnership agreement which conditions payment of earned but uncollected partnership revenues upon a withdrawing partner's obligation to refrain from the practice of law in competition with the former law firm restricts the practice of law in violation of Disciplinary Rule 2-108 (A) of the New York Code of Professional Responsibility and is unenforceable in these circumstances as against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases