1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 726 F.Supp.
  5. 726 F.Supp. 969 (1989)
 

SHAW v. ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC.

No. 86 Civ. 5244 (WCC).

726 F.Supp. 969 (1989)

Leslie SHAW, Plaintiff, v. ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Soller, Singer & Horn (Carl R. Soller, Ellen L. Federman, of counsel), New York City, for plaintiff.

Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty (Stephen F. Ruffino, of counsel), New York City, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.

Defendants Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. and Rolex Industries, Inc. (collectively "defendants") move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). For the reasons articulated below, defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Leslie Shaw commenced this action on June 30, 1986. Shaw alleged that defendants had unlawfully engaged in a conspiracy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases