Where an insurer, acting in bad faith, refuses to settle an underlying personal injury action against its insured for a sum within the limits of its policy, and where, as a result, the insured is exposed to liability in excess of the policy limits, then a cause of action in favor of the insured and against the insurer may arise (see, e.g., Kulak v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROLDAN v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.
149 A.D.2d 20 (1989)
Celia Roldan, Respondent, v. Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 3, 1989
July 3, 1989
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Pizzitola & Di Blasi, P. C. (
Paul S. Mirman, P. C. (
MOLLEN, P. J., SULLIVAN and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.