ROGERS v. WOLFSON

No. 05-88-00234-CV.

763 S.W.2d 922 (1989)

Dr. S.J. ROGERS and Dr. N. Jay Rogers, Appellants, v. Dr. Jerome WOLFSON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Rehearing Denied February 13, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Orrin Harrison, III, Timothy W. Mountz, Jesse Green, Dallas, for appellants.

Steven R. Wolfson, Dallas, for appellee.

Before ENOCH, C.J., and CARVER and HUGHES, JJ.


ENOCH, Chief Justice.

Dr. S.J. Rogers and Dr. N. Jay Rogers appeal from the district court's grant of Dr. Jerome Wolfson's motion for summary judgment. The Rogers sued Wolfson for an accounting and to recover sums of money due and owing under the terms of a written agreement. In six points of error, the Rogers contend that the trial court erred in granting Wolfson's motion for summary judgment. Agreeing with points three through six, we reverse and remand this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases