CURTIS v. EIKENBERRY

No. 88-3917.

877 F.2d 802 (1989)

Richard N. CURTIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kenneth O. EIKENBERRY, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 13, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce D. MacLean, MacLean & MacLean, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner-appellant.

Linda A. Dalton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., for respondent-appellee.

Before PREGERSON, BOOCHEVER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.


PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Following a criminal conviction, petitioner Richard N. Curtis was adjudged to be an habitual criminal pursuant to section 9.92.090 of the Washington Code.1 On appeal, the Washington Court of Appeals vacated the habitual criminal judgment, ruling that the existence and validity of three of the four prior convictions that the state alleged as the basis of the habitual criminal judgment had not been proved beyond...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases