1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 42 Ohio
  5. 42 Ohio St. 3d 124 (1989)
 

IN RE ORDER REQUIRING FINGERPRINTING OF A JUVENILE

No. 88-5.

42 Ohio St. 3d 124 (1989)

IN RE ORDER REQUIRING FINGERPRINTING OF A JUVENILE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 3, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Purola & Savage and Albert L. Purola, for appellant.

John E. Shoop, prosecuting attorney, and Ron Graham, for appellee.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

The sole issue presented in this case is: Under what circumstances may a juvenile court judge order the fingerprinting of a juvenile pursuant to R.C. 2151.313 (A)(1)?

R.C. 2151.313 provides in pertinent part:

"(A)(1) Except as provides in division (A)(2) of this section, no child shall be fingerprinted or photographed in the investigation of any violation of law without the consent of the juvenile judge.

"(2) Fingerprints...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases