1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 891 F.2d
  5. 891 F.2d 762 (1989)
 

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. v. SEAFIRST CORP.

Nos. 88-3970, 88-4342 and 88-7248.

891 F.2d 762 (1989)

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEAFIRST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEAFIRST CORPORATION, Defendant, and Davis, Wright & Jones, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, and Davis, Wright & Jones; Marsh & McLennan; Arthur Andersen & Co., Respondent-Intervenor, and Seafirst Corporation, Real Party in Interest.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 12, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley D. Stam, Michael D. Helgren, Timothy K. Thorson and Gregory C. Narver, Culp, Guterson & Grader, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellant.

Bruce E.H. Johnson and Bruce Lamka, Davis, Wright & Jones, Seattle, Wash., for Davis, Wright & Jones.

Phillip H. Ginsberg, William R. Bishin and Patrick S. Brady, Ginsberg & Stanich, Seattle, Wash., for Marsh & McLennan.

Richard M. Clinton, Ronald T. Schaps and Lucy P. Isaki, Bogle & Gates, Seattle, Wash. and Robert D. McLean, John M. George, Jr., and Frank B. Vanker, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for Arthur Andersen & Co.

Before HUG, FARRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. and Seafirst Corporation reached a comprehensive settlement after judgment was entered against National Union in Part I, of a planned two part trial. As part of the settlement Seafirst supported National Union's motion to vacate the judgment that was entered against National Union in Part I of the trial. The district court denied the motion. National Union seeks a writ of mandamus or alternatively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases