1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 211 Cal.App.3d
  5. 211 Cal.App.3d 1439 (1989)
 

ELSTER v. FRIEDMAN

Docket No. B026037.

211 Cal.App.3d 1439 (1989)

260 Cal. Rptr. 148

SANDY ELSTER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PHILLIP C. FRIEDMAN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

July 5, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William E. Johnson for Defendants and Appellants.

Paul R. Torre and Caditz & Grant for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

ROTH, P.J.

Phillip C. Friedman and Charlene Kahle appeal from the award of costs and attorney fees in favor of Sandy Elster and Ernestine Elster in the Elsters' action for an injunction prohibiting harassment. The question on appeal is whether respondents are the "prevailing parties" within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6, subdivision (h).1 We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases