1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 888 F.2d
  5. 888 F.2d 755 (1989)
 

DeSISTO COLLEGE, INC. v. LINE

No. 88-3333.

888 F.2d 755 (1989)

DeSISTO COLLEGE, INC. and Loren E. Horner, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Thomas P. LINE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

November 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roderick MacLeish, Jr., Richard J. Landau, Fine & Ambrogne, Boston, Mass., Stephen H. Durant, Martin, Ade, Birchfield & Mickler, P.A., William E. Kuntz, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.

J. Stephen McDonald, John M. Robertson, Keith R. Mitnik, Robertson, Williams, Mitnik & McDonald, P.A., Orlando, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Before FAY and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD, Senior District Judge.

FAY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the propriety of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 ("Rule 11") sanctions imposed on counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants ("Counsel") for signing pleadings without having first made reasonable inquiry into the facts and the law of the case. The district court found, first, that Counsel neglected to follow the court's instructions on restructuring the Second Amended Complaint to form the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases