PERMANENCE CORP. v. KENNAMETAL, INC.

No. 88-1442.

725 F.Supp. 907 (1989)

PERMANENCE CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, Plaintiff, v. KENNAMETAL, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

May 18, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald C. Winiemko of Conner, Harbour & Green, P.C., Bloomfield Hills, Mich. (Armand Kunz, Golden & Kunz, Southfield, Mich., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Ernie Brooks, Mark Cantor and Christopher Fildes, Southfield, Mich., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

RALPH M. FREEMAN, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). In this diversity action, plaintiff seeks damages for the breach of an implied obligation of a licensing agreement. Plaintiff's complaint includes the following averments:

4. On the 8th day of February, 1979, the parties hereto did enter into a written agreement, ..., whereby plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases