1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 210 Cal.App.3d
  5. 210 Cal.App.3d 1413 (1989)
 

MANDICINO v. MAGGARD

Docket No. A037969.

210 Cal.App.3d 1413 (1989)

258 Cal. Rptr. 917

ROSELLA MANDICINO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLOTTE MAGGARD, as City Clerk, etc., Defendant; TERRY CATER, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

May 30, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John E. Mueller, James R. Parrinello, Marguerite Mary Leoni, Jewell J. Hargleroad and Nielsen, Merksamer, Hodgson, Parrinello & Mueller for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

W. Craig Biddle, Warren C. Stracener, Biddle & Hamilton, Fred L. Main, William M. Pfeiffer, June Babiracki Barlow and Judith K. Herzberg as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Mark Goldowitz, Richard M. Pearl and Philip Bertenthal for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

MERRILL, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees under section 1021.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.1

Respondent Rosella Mandicino filed a petition for writ of mandate under Elections Code section 5025, against the San Pablo City Clerk, challenging as false and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases