1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 882 F.2d
  5. 882 F.2d 739 (1989)
 

BARTEK v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH

Nos. 88-3463, 88-3485.

882 F.2d 739 (1989)

Joseph P. BARTEK v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH. Joseph P. BARTEK, v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided August 11, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied October 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrienne Johnson (argued), Allan E. MacLeod, Coraopolis, Pa., for appellant, cross-appellee.

Michael J. Scott (argued), Asst. Gen. Counsel, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee, cross-appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STAPLETON and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied October 18, 1989.

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This is both an appeal and cross appeal from the judgment of the district court awarding compensatory and liquidated damages in an age discrimination suit. Upon our review of the record, we find sufficient evidence to support a jury finding of discrimination. We find, however, insufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases