INGRAM, Presiding Judge.
The parties were divorced by a decree dated February 9, 1989. This decree was by answer and waiver and incorporated the parties' agreement, which awarded custody of the parties' minor child to the father. On February 27, 1989, the mother filed a motion to set aside the divorce decree, contending that she was to actually have custody of the minor child, even though she had signed an agreement to the contrary.
After an ore tenus proceeding...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
