J. ED TEASE, Retired Circuit Judge.
Judgment debtor appeals from the trial court's ruling that her future wages could not be exempt from garnishment even though the underlying debt was created prior to adoption of Act 88-294, which act specifically excluded wages, salaries, and other compensation from the $3,000 personal property exemption provided by section 6-10-6, Code 1975.
Appellant's brief states the issue presented to us as follows: Did Act 88-294,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
