PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He contends that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty and that his actions were justified as self-defense, but the contentions lack merit. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is unlawful. Watson v. OSP,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.