1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 208 Cal.App.3d
  5. 208 Cal.App.3d 1394 (1989)
 

CITY OF GLENDALE v. GEORGE

Docket No. B032383.

208 Cal.App.3d 1394 (1989)

256 Cal. Rptr. 742

CITY OF GLENDALE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT GEORGE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

March 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Carol A. Sobel, Joan W. Howarth, Paul L. Hoffman and Clifford N. Barry for Defendants and Appellants.

Frank R. Manzano, City Attorney, and Scott H. Howard, Assistant City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WOODS (A.M.), P.J.

This appeal is from an order denying the motion of Robert and Stella George (appellants) to vacate a consent judgment into which they had entered with the City of Glendale (the City).

(1) We must first consider the procedural validity of this appeal. Ordinarily, a consent judgment cannot be attacked. (Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. Hildebrand (1965)

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases