STATE v. RADAR

No. 88-1803.

47 Ohio St. 3d 112 (1989)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. RADAR, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 13, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, L. Susan Laker and David L. Prem, for appellant.

H. Fred Hoefle, for appellee.


This cause came before this court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District in State v. Howell (1981), 5 Ohio App.3d 92, 5 OBR 206, 449 N.E.2d 523, upon the following question:

"* * *[W]hether a judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded when a trial court errs in granting a motion to amend the indictment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases