COBB, Judge.
The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred by prospectively ruling that cross-examination by Andino's counsel of Andino's co-defendants, in the event they testified in their own behalf, would constitute "offering testimony in his own behalf" under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.250 so as to forfeit his right to first and last final argument.
We answered this question in Hart v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.