TURMAN v. U.S.

Nos. 87-452, 87-453.

555 A.2d 1037 (1989)

Arthur Nathaniel TURMAN, Willie Franklin Howard, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided March 30, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Borge Varmer, appointed by this court, for appellant Turman.

Beth Goodman, Washington, D.C., appointed by this court, for appellant Howard.

Kathleen Brandon, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee.

Before FERREN and BELSON, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Appellants, each found guilty after a bench trial of one count of sexual solicitation,1 now assert two grounds for reversal: (1) there was insufficient evidence adduced at trial to support their convictions, and (2) the trial judge erred in crediting the testimony of the arresting officer in part based on his familiarity with the officer's credibility in other cases. We agree with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases