OZEROL v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY

No. 86-1057.

555 A.2d 1033 (1989)

Nail H. OZEROL, Appellant, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

March 24, 1989.


STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

At trial, it was stipulated by Howard University that when tenured or tenuretrack professors were paid in whole or in part from grant funds, "their employment papers, as far as the grant was concerned, had an expiration date." In his petition for rehearing of our decision in this case, 545 A.2d 638 (D.C.1988), Ozerol asserts that both the trial court and this panel overlooked the stipulation in giving weight...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases