1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 558 So.2d
  5. 558 So.2d 1029 (1989)
 

OKALOOSA COUNTY v. OKALOOSA ISLAND LEASEHOLDERS

No. 88-2134.

558 So.2d 1029 (1989)

OKALOOSA COUNTY, Appellant, v. OKALOOSA ISLAND LEASEHOLDERS, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

On Motion for Rehearing March 9, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter A. Steigleman, of Dewell & Brannon, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.

D. Michael Chesser, of Chesser, Wingard, Barr & Townsend, Chartered, Shalimar, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J., and THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION

We deny appellant's motions for rehearing and certification, and grant their motion for clarification as follows. We affirm the trial court's interpretation of the subject covenants and restrictions. However, we hereby clarify our per curiam affirmance and hold that Okaloosa County, Florida possesses neither more...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases