1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 207 Cal.App.3d
  5. 207 Cal.App.3d 1377 (1989)
 

SLEMAKER v. WOOLLEY

Docket No. B033490.

207 Cal.App.3d 1377 (1989)

255 Cal. Rptr. 532

C.M. SLEMAKER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JOHN WOOLLEY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

February 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sanders, Barnet, Jacobson, Goldman & Mosk, Richard M. Mosk, Bernard P. Simons, Scott L. Zimmerman, Burkley, Moore, Greenberg & Lyman and Walter R. Burkley, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.

Spierer, Woodward, Denis & Furstman and Stanley T. Denis, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

ORTEGA, J. —

INTRODUCTION

This is a purported appeal from an order of the superior court imposing sanctions on counsel for improperly suspending the deposition of a witness. We hold that the order is not separately appealable and dismiss the appeal.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 15, 1988, plaintiffs C.M. Slemaker and Roberta Slemaker served notice by telecopy to defendants' counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases