FARLEY v. MVD

MVD 15 870814 6130; CA A47759.

769 P.2d 781 (1989)

95 Or.App. 417

Lloyd Martin FARLEY, Petitioner, v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 1, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Lundeen, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Meg Reeves, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and GRABER and RIGGS, JJ.


GRABER, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of a Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) order that suspended his driving privileges. He contends that MVD had no statutory authority to suspend his license, that he did not receive adequate notice of the basis for the suspension, and that MVD erred in setting the period during which he must provide proof of financial responsibility. We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. On May 22, 1986, petitioner was convicted, on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases