CHAPMAN & COLE v. ITEL CONTAINER INTERN. B.V.

No. 87-2973.

865 F.2d 676 (1989)

CHAPMAN & COLE and CCP, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants, Appellees-Cross Appellants, v. ITEL CONTAINER INTERNATIONAL B.V. and Itel Containers International Corp. (ITEL), Defendants-Counter Plaintiffs, Third Party Plaintiffs, Appellants-Cross Appellees. URQUHART AND HASSELL, Attorneys for Itel Container International B.V., et al., Appellants, v. Norman EHRENTRAUT, Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Silvia T. Hassell, Edward D. Urquhart, Houston, Tex., David R. Noteware, Laurie Dore, Dallas, Tex., for Itel Container Intern. B.V.

William G. Rosch, III, Houston, Tex., for Urquhart & Hassell.

J. Douglas Sutter, Houston, Tex., for Chapman & Cole.

Fritz Barnett, Mary Kay Klimesh, Houston, Tex., for Ehrentraut.

Before GEE, SNEED and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

This action arose over the commercial lease of a container yard. Chapman & Cole (Chapman), the landlord, brought this suit seeking recovery for failure to pay rent and failure to maintain the premises properly against Itel Container International B.V. (Itel), the tenant. Itel counterclaimed alleging that Chapman had failed to design and construct the container yard adequately and alleging a RICO violation by Chapman and one of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases