STATE of Oregon ex rel. Michael D. Schrunk, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Plaintiff-Relator,
v.
Stephen S. WALKER, Judge of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County, Defendant.
State of Oregon ex rel. Michael D. Schrunk, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Plaintiff-Relator,
v.
JAMES R. ELLIS, Judge of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County, Defendant.
State of Oregon ex rel. Michael D. Schrunk, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Plaintiff-Relator,
v.
WILLIAM C. SNOUFFER, Judge of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted October 5, 1989.
Decided October 10, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the petitions for alternative writs of mandamus for plaintiff-relator.
Anthony D. Bornstein, Metropolitan Public Defender, Portland, argued the cause and filed a memorandum in opposition and a motion to dismiss for defendant Judge Walker.
Paul DeMuniz, of Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & DeMuniz, P.C., Salem, argued the cause and filed a motion to dismiss for defendant Judge Ellis.
David T. McDonald, Metropolitan Public Defender, Portland, argued the cause and filed a memorandum in opposition and a motion to dismiss for defendant Judge Snouffer.
Before CARSON, P.J., and JONES, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN and FADELEY, JJ.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant judges1 each currently preside over one or more criminal cases in Multnomah County Circuit Court in which the criminal defendant has challenged the county's jury panel as legally defective. ORS 136.005 permits either party to a criminal case (the district attorney or the defendant) to challenge the entire jury panel, prior to voir dire, on the ground that there has been "a material departure from the requirements...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
