SEABOARD CONTR. v. SMITHTOWN


147 A.D.2d 4 (1989)

Seaboard Contracting & Material, Inc., Respondent, v. Town of Smithtown et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 8, 1989


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Twomey, Latham, Shea & Kelley (Maureen T. Liccione and Catriona Glazebrook of counsel), for appellants.

Cole & Deitz (Joseph A. DiBenedetto and Joseph G. Colao of counsel), for respondent.

E. Thomas Boyle, County Attorney (Caroline Levy of counsel), for Suffolk County Planning Commission, amicus curiae.

MANGANO, J. P., BRACKEN, SPATT and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action for a judgment declaring that the provisions of Town of Smithtown Code chapters 44A and 54 are unconstitutional insofar as they are applicable to the mining industry (see, NY Const, art 9, § 2). We hold that the provisions in issue are constitutional on their face, and the plaintiff's contentions that they are unconstitutional as applied to it should be asserted in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases