1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 208 Cal.App.3d
  5. 208 Cal.App.3d 1250 (1989)
 

GAILLARD v. NATOMAS CO.

Docket No. A040647.

208 Cal.App.3d 1250 (1989)

256 Cal. Rptr. 702

TILLY GAILLARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NATOMAS COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. VINCENT J. ASHTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DORMAN L. COMMONS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

March 23, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

David B. Gold, Paul F. Bennett, Solomon B. Cera, Lowey, Dannenberg & Knapp, Stephen Lowey and Henry A. Brachtl for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

David G. Robertson, Paul Flum, Neal S. Berinhout, Morrison & Foerster, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, William I. Edlund, John F. McLean, Kevin M. Fong, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, James E. Lyons, Harriet S. Posner and Jeffrey T. Makoff for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

STRANKMAN, J. —

I

Statement of the Case

(1) (See fn. 1.) These shareholder derivative actions1 arise from the merger of Natomas Company (Natomas) into Diamond Shamrock Corporation (Diamond), effective August 31, 1983. By their complaints, appellant Tilly Gaillard, a common stockholder of Natomas, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases