1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 216 Cal.App.3d
  5. 216 Cal.App.3d 1208 (1989)
 

BIXEL ASSOCIATES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B037251.

216 Cal.App.3d 1208 (1989)

265 Cal. Rptr. 347

BIXEL ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

December 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Greenberg, Glusker, Fields, Claman & Machtinger, Norman H. Levine and Kathleen A. O'Brien for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Claudia McGee Henry, Assistant City Attorney, Sharon Siedorf Cardenas, Robert N. Kwong and Thomas A. Kathe, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

OPINION

HANSON, J.

Plaintiff Bixel Associates, a partnership (hereinafter Bixel), filed a complaint seeking refund of a fire hydrant fee of $135,520 from the named defendants, the City of Los Angeles and its department of building and safety (hereinafter City). City answered plaintiff's complaint and filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief.

After discovery, both parties made motions for summary judgment. Upon conclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases