1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 771 P.2d
  5. 771 P.2d 652 (1989)
 

DEYOE v. HOLLOWAY

79-3003-E-1; CA A47487.

771 P.2d 652 (1989)

96 Or.App. 105

Jay W. DEYOE, Jr., Appellant — Cross-Respondent, v. James L. HOLLOWAY, Respondent — Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 5, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied May 26, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Stark, Medford, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Stark and Hammack, Medford.

Ervin B. Hogan, Medford, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Daniel C. Thorndike and Blackhurst, Hornecker, Hassen & Thorndike, Medford.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought this action for an accounting of his interest in a partnership with defendant. In an earlier appeal, Deyoe v. Holloway, 66 Or.App. 352, 674 P.2d 1187 (1984), we reversed the trial court's denial of an accounting and remanded with instructions on how to interpret the partnership agreement in calculating the amount due on the accounting. No petition for review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases