1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 710 F.Supp.
  5. 710 F.Supp. 711 (1989)
 

HEIDEMAN v. PFL, INC.

No. 88-0010-CV-W-JWO.

710 F.Supp. 711 (1989)

Leo HEIDEMAN, et ux., Plaintiffs, v. PFL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D.

April 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Klein, Dennis E. Egan, Popham, Conway, Sweeny, Fremont & Bundschu, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiffs.

John F. Wymer, Paul T. Stagliano, John R. Phillips, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Atlanta, Ga., John R. Phillips, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN W. OLIVER, Senior District Judge.

I

The above-captioned case pends on defendant's motion for summary judgment in which the defendant asserts that all five counts1 of plaintiffs' complaint are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiffs maintain that "[t]here are no statute of limitations issues in the instant litigation that properly may be resolved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases