1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 544 So.2d
  5. 544 So.2d 873 (1989)
 

BUSH v. GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.

87-278.

544 So.2d 873 (1989)

Lloyd BUSH v. GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Philips of Tully & Philips, Mobile, for appellant.

Joseph W. Letzer and John C. Morrow of Burr & Forman, Birmingham, Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, Michael Straus and Rita A. Micheli of Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for appellees Goldman Sachs & Co., William B. Blount Co., Inc. and Frazier Lanier Co., Inc.

Robert M. Galloway of Collins, Galloway & Smith, Mobile, for appellee City of Mobile.

MADDOX, Justice.

Lloyd Bush, owner of Lloyd Bush & Associates ("Bush"), sued the City of Mobile ("City"), Goldman Sachs & Co. ("Goldman Sachs"), William B. Blount, Inc. ("Blount"), and the Frazer Lanier Company ("Frazer Lanier"), alleging that the defendants appropriated his work product and that the work product was a trade secret.

Bush specializes in governmental-related financing transactions, and, by the use of computers, he developed a scheme...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases