STATE v. HUXTABLE

Nos. DA371152, C88-05-33640; CA A49554 (Control), CA A49555.

779 P.2d 631 (1989)

98 Or.App. 588

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Roxie A. HUXTABLE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 27, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Janet Metcalf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant challenges probation conditions1 imposed after her convictions for escape in the second degree, ORS 162.155, and loitering to solicit prostitution. Portland City Code § 14.24.050(b). We direct deletion of "additional orders" imposed as part of the loitering sentence and do not address the other issues raised because they are moot.2

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases