1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 870 F.2d
  5. 870 F.2d 529 (1989)
 

HOEHNE v. COUNTY OF SAN BENITO

No. 87-2825.

870 F.2d 529 (1989)

Karl O. HOEHNE and Phyllis Hoehne, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN BENITO; Henry Solorio; Frank Sabbatini; Enos Silva; and Edward Lydon, Defendants/Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven G. Baird, Mountain View, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellants.

David E. Pipal, Hollister, Cal., for defendants/appellees.

Before ALDISERT, BRUNETTI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:

We are to decide, under the specific facts in this case, whether the district court erred in dismissing for lack of ripeness the complaint of San Benito County, California, landowners Karl O. Hoehne and Phyllis Hoehne, filed against the County of San Benito and certain County officials. The court ruled that the Hoehnes' claims were not ripe because there had been no final decision by the County concerning the Hoehnes' land-use application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases