STANFIELD v. SHELLMAKER, INC.

No. 87-2920.

869 F.2d 521 (1989)

Philip STANFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELLMAKER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 9, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Hillsman, McGuinn, Hillsman & Palesky, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Gary A. Angel, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before CHOY, CANBY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Phillip Stanfield appeals from a final judgment in the district court following a bench trial of his claims under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688. Stanfield contends that the district court erred in finding as a matter of law that he was not a "seaman" under the Jones Act because he was employed on a vessel that was not operating on navigable waters. He further contends that the district court erred in finding that the "fleet seaman"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases