1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 543 So.2d
  5. 543 So.2d 845 (1989)
 

SAPIENZA v. SECURITY INS. CO. OF HARTFORD

No. 87-0626.

543 So.2d 845 (1989)

Randall SAPIENZA, Appellant, v. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing and Clarification Denied June 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. McCollem and Mark N. Hirsch of Chidnese & McCollem, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

James G. Salerno and Paula Kessler of Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court granting appellee's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. Appellant's complaint was for arbitration on uninsured motorist benefits under a garage keepers policy. Appellee moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that a garage keepers policy does not fall within the statutory mandates of section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1987), providing for uninsured motorist coverage. However, in Coleman v. Florida...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases