REESE v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY

07-87-384; CA A45850.

770 P.2d 613 (1989)

95 Or.App. 740

Albert REESE, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Corrections Division, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 22, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Douglas F. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary, seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent finding him guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 13: conspiracy to possess or use narcotics. He was ordered to serve three months in segregation and to pay a $100 fine. He contends that there was not sufficient admissible evidence to support the finding of guilty and that the superintendent does not have authority to impose a fine.

We conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases