NEGRETE v. STATE PERSONNEL BD.

Docket No. C004110.

213 Cal.App.3d 1160 (1989)

262 Cal. Rptr. 72

FERNANDO NEGRETE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Defendant and Appellant; FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

August 16, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank and Ramon M. de la Guardia, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant and for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Gary P. Reynolds and Darrell S. Steinberg for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

BLEASE, Acting P.J.

Defendant California State Personnel Board (Personnel Board) and real party in interest California Franchise Tax Board (Tax Board) appeal from the trial court's decision to grant a writ of mandate in favor of plaintiff Fernando Negrete.

The Personnel Board affirmed an order of the Tax Board suspending Negrete for 90 days without pay because he was "inefficient" in failing to discover promptly that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases