1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 213 Cal.App.3d
  5. 213 Cal.App.3d 1139 (1989)
 

L.I.F.E. COMMITTEE v. CITY OF LODI

Docket No. C000443.

213 Cal.App.3d 1139 (1989)

262 Cal. Rptr. 166

L.I.F.E. COMMITTEE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF LODI, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

September 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ronald M. Stein, Deputy City Attorney, Mark I. Weinberger, Shute, Mihally & Weinberger and Daniel P. Selmi for Defendant and Appellant.

Steven A. Herum, Neumiller & Beardslee, Daniel J. Curtin and McCutcheon, Doyle, Brown & Enerson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

A city may make and enforce ordinances and regulations not in conflict with the general law of the state (Cal. Const., art. XI, § 7). In this appeal we consider whether an initiative ordinance, presented to the electorate of the City of Lodi as Measure A, conforms with the implicit limitations of article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution. The ostensible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases