1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 774 S.W.2d
  5. 774 S.W.2d 573 (1989)
 

THOMAS v. STATE

No. WD 41569.

774 S.W.2d 573 (1989)

L.T. THOMAS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

August 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L.T. Thomas, Mineral Point, pro se.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before GAITAN, P.J., and MANFORD and ULRICH, JJ.

MANFORD, Judge.

This appeal is presented pro se following a hearing upon a Rule 29.15 motion wherein movant was represented by counsel. The hearing court denied relief.

This appeal is dismissed for the following reasons:

There is no jurisdictional statement, no statement of facts, and no points relied upon. Presentment of the appeal violates Rule 30.06 and Rule 84.04. In addition, movant presented 42 various claims in his motion which involved trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases