PER CURIAM.
The appellant was convicted of second degree murder and possession of a firearm arising out the same criminal episode. She urges error in the sufficiency of the evidence, in the court's reinstruction of the jury, and in the conviction for possession of a firearm (which was used in the homicide.) We find no error in the first two grounds. Hedges v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.