1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 444 N.W.2d
  5. 444 N.W.2d 889 (1989)
 

PADCO, INC. v. KINNEY & LANGE

No. C6-89-192.

444 N.W.2d 889 (1989)

PADCO, INC., Appellant, v. KINNEY & LANGE, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey W. Cook, Timothy R. Duncan, Daniel P. Ofstedal, Winthrop & Weinstine, St. Paul, for appellant.

John M. Degnan, Mark P. Hodkinson, Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., NORTON and LOMMEN, JJ.

OPINION

A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.

Padco, Inc. appeals from a grant of summary judgment to Kinney and Lange and David Fairbairn. We affirm.

FACTS

In February 1981 EZ Paintr Corporation (EZ Paintr) initiated an action in federal court against Padco, Inc. (Padco) for patent infringement. Kinney and Lange law firm represented Padco in the action, with David Fairbairn as the lead attorney. During the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases