1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 716 F.Supp.
  5. 716 F.Supp. 614 (1989)
 

SINKWICH v. TEXACO REFINING & MARKETING, INC.

Civ. A. No. 86-59-ATH (WDO).

716 F.Supp. 614 (1989)

Frank S. SINKWICH, Individually and Frank S. Sinkwich, Inc., d/b/a Southern Oil Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. TEXACO REFINING & MARKETING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Athens Division.

June 28, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas B. Murphy, Bremen, Ga., and Gregg R. Potvin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Robert C. Norman, Jr., Macon, Ga., and Mark D. Litvack, White Plains, N.Y., for defendant.

ORDER

OWENS, Chief Judge.

On December 23, 1987, this court denied defendant Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.'s ("Texaco") motion for summary judgment on a Sherman Act antitrust claim brought by Frank S. Sinkwich both individually and doing business as Southern Oil Company, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Southern"). Extensive discovery ensued. Upon reviewing the voluminous files, including newly submitted depositions, affidavits and other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases