1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 722 F.Supp.
  5. 722 F.Supp. 607 (1989)
 

U.S. EX REL. NEWSHAM v. LOCKHEED

No. C 88-20009 RPA.

722 F.Supp. 607 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Margaret A. NEWSHAM and Martin Overbeek Bloem, Plaintiffs, v. LOCKHEED MISSILES AND SPACE COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy T. Saperstein, Saperstein & Seligman, Oakland, Cal., Michael F. Hertz and Vincent B. Terlep, Jr., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and James M. Spears, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and William F. Murphy, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Jose, Cal., for plaintiffs.

James J. Gallagher, Charles Pereyra-Suarez and John G. Stafford, Jr., McKenna, Conner & Cuneo, Los Angeles, Cal., and B. Scott Silverman and Paula S. Downey, Morrison & Foerster, Palo Alto, Cal., for defendant.

OPINION FOR PUBLICATION OF ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS QUI TAM ACTION AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL*

AGUILAR, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Inc. (Lockheed) moves to dismiss this qui tam action as unconstitutional under Article II and Article III of the U.S. Constitution. Specifically, under Article II, defendant argues that the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act violate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases