HAYS, Justice.
In this appeal from a conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, appellant raises two points for reversal: the sufficiency of the evidence and whether the prosecuting attorney was acting without sufficient authorization. We find no merit in either argument.
Appellant, Charles Summers was charged with the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, marijuana, the alleged delivery occurring on March 10, 1988. The case was heard by a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.