HOMAMI v. IRANZADI

Docket No. H003970.

211 Cal.App.3d 1104 (1989)

260 Cal. Rptr. 6

AHMAD S. HOMAMI, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. MANSOOR IRANZADI et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

June 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Brian Fortune Gill for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Eugene Epstein and Shostak & Epstein for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

BRAUER, J.

Ahmad S. Homami sued Mansoor Iranzadi to collect the balance due on a promissory note. Iranzadi claimed he had paid down the principal balance by approximately $40,000. Homami acknowledged receiving that amount but claimed the payments represented interest only. The note expressly provided: "This note shall bear no interest." But Homami testified at trial that the parties nonetheless had an oral agreement for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases