BONFIELD v. AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.

No. 88 C 7059.

717 F.Supp. 589 (1989)

Emmett BONFIELD, Plaintiff, v. AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

July 5, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A.J. Hohman, Jr., Hope, Hohman & Georges, San Antonio, Tex., Timothy J. McGonegle, Ashcraft & Ashcraft, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Marc P. Seidler, John F. Verhey, Rudnick & Wolfe, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

This is a sequel to the "Opinion" (708 F.Supp. 867 (N.D.Ill.1989)1) issued in this case just four months ago, disposing of all but two of Bonfield's claims. After issuance of the Opinion, Bonfield filed a two-count First Amended Complaint (the "Complaint") asserting:

1. in Count I that omissions by AAMCO violated the Franchise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases