HINMAN v. MORRISON-KNUDSEN CO., INC.

Nos. 17325, 17461.

771 P.2d 533 (1989)

115 Idaho 869

Pauline H. HINMAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MORRISON-KNUDSEN COMPANY, INC., and E.R. Burge, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 31, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Boise, Idaho, for defendants-appellants. Richard C. Fields argued.

Skinner, Fawcett & Mauk, Boise, Idaho, for plaintiff-respondent. W. Craig James argued.


SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The principal issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for a new trial after four separate special jury verdicts had been returned in favor of the defendants. Also, error is asserted in the trial court's denial of defendant-appellant Burge's motion for attorney fees. We affirm the decision of the trial court as to both issues.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases