1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 556 So.2d
  5. 556 So.2d 748 (1989)
 

SUNSET COMMERCIAL BANK v. PYRAMIDS DEV. CORP.

No. 89-35.

556 So.2d 748 (1989)

SUNSET COMMERCIAL BANK, Appellant, v. PYRAMIDS DEVELOPMENT CORP., Jose I. Macia, and Claudio Alvarez, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Robert M. Brochin and Scott L. Pestcoe, for appellant.

Hollander, Schiffrin & Bartelstone and Ted H. Bartelstone, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., COPE, J., and GAVIN K. LETTS, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to concur in appellant's construction of the supersedeas bond and instead agree with the interpretation given by the trial court. On this record, this bond was intended to encompass appellate review by any appropriate means, including the petition for certiorari filed by appellant.1 If we accept appellant's invitation to read the terms of the bond in a strictly technical sense, then appellant breached its obligations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases